ACCC v Hutchinson: understanding an “understanding”

Gadens acted for Hutchinson Builders (Hutchinson) in a recent High Court case,[1] in which the ACCC unsuccessfully sought to overturn a finding made by the Full Court[2] that an “understanding” for the purposes of s 45E(3) of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) (CCA) requires communication of assent that precedes and is distinct from […]

Readmore

---

Hutchinson Builders v ACCC: Full Court finds termination of subcontract did not contravene “boycotting” laws; clears Hutchies of wrongdoing

Hutchinson Builders (Hutchies) is Australia’s largest privately owned construction company. Throughout its 110+ year history it has delivered countless significant projects across Australia. One such project, which was the subject of the Full Court’s decision in J Hutchinson Pty Ltd v ACCC, was a construction project located in South Brisbane known as the “Southpoint Project”. […]

Readmore

---

Federal Court takes aim at expert’s ‘independent’ evidence: When lawyers can taint an expert’s report

The case of New Aim Pty Ltd v Leung [2022] FCA 722 concerned a dispute between an e-commerce company and its former employees regarding the use of confidential information acquired during the course of employment. A significant issue in the case, which is the focus of this article, was whether the Court should reject an […]

Readmore

---