In this edition of the Queensland Corruption and Integrity Update we consider various updates related to the Crime and Corruption Commission (CCC), developments from the Councillor Conduct Tribunal (CCT), relevant updates arising from the 2025-26 Queensland Budget, and an update from the Electoral Commission Queensland (ECQ) about the 2024 State general election. We also consider updates from the Office of the Information Commissioner and the Queensland Integrity Commissioner.
CCC updated strategic plan
On 1 July 2025, the CCC released an updated 2023 to 2027 Strategic Plan, outlining its objectives and strategies over the coming years.
The core objectives, set out in the plan previously (and highlighted in the August 2024 edition of the Gadens Corruption and Integrity Update) remain:
The strategic risks highlighted by the CCC continue to include increased use of technology and cybersecurity risks, new forms of digital technology that may influence intelligence, talent shortages and the changing nature of the workforce, regulation, changes within the CCC, public confidence in the CCC, and economic instability.
Finally, the CCC set out a number of performance metrics for 2025-26, including:
Review into CCC activities
The Parliamentary Crime and Corruption Committee (PCCC) has commenced its latest five-year review of the activities of the CCC (the Review) in accordance with section 292(f) of the Crime and Corruption Act 2001. In conducting the Review, the PCCC will examine the CCC’s performance over the course of the last five years, as well as considering its jurisdiction, responsibilities, functions and powers, as well as issues raised in its previous review and inquires. The PCCC will examine the CCC’s performance in relation to various functions, including:
Submissions are open until 3 October 2025, with public hearings to follow the review of submissions and the final report expected to be tabled by 30 June 2026.
CCC issues advice for public sector employees on public records
On 30 May 2025, the CCC and Queensland State Archives released guidance on the requirements and benefits of recordkeeping for employees of public authorities.
Key observations from the guide include:
Quarterly update on Commission of Inquiry recommendation implementation
On 9 July 2025, the CCC released its tenth quarterly report on the ‘Implementation and delivery of COI recommendations’. The CCC continues progressing its implementation of the recommendations since the last report, with only the following recommendations still in progress:
On 24 June 2025, the Queensland Government handed down its 2025-26 budget.
Key budget highlights for some of Queensland’s integrity bodies include:
The budget also includes an additional $19.7 million over two years for the Commission of Inquiry into the Child Safety System, and an additional $1 million in funding over two years for an independent review of Queensland’s DNA testing operations and reform progress, which follows the 2022 Commission of Inquiry into Forensic DNA Testing in Queensland and the 2023 Commission of Inquiry to examine DNA Project 13 concerns.
Report relating to implementation of recommendations through staff education
On 11 June 2025, the Queensland Information Commissioner tabled its report entitled ‘Follow-up of Report No. 1 for 2022-23 – Mitigating the risks of privacy breach through staff education’ (the Follow-up Report). The Follow-up Report is the third in a series that examines how agencies educate and train their employees about their obligations under the Information Privacy Act 2009 (Qld).
In November 2022, the Information Commissioners had made ten recommendations to the Department of Transport and Main Roads, WorkCover Queensland and the Queensland Rural and Industry Development Authority (QRIDA) which broadly can be summarised as including:
In June 2024, the OIC commenced a follow-up audit to assess the progress of the relevant agencies in the implementation of the recommendations. The audit revealed significant progress in the implementation of recommendations, with five being fully implemented.
Key observations of the Follow-up Report included:
On 11 June 2025, a public briefing was held with the Department of Local Government, Water and Volunteers. The Department provided an update relating to upcoming priorities including the parliamentary review of:
It was noted that a commitment of the Department was a review of the complaints framework for councillors, including the operations of the Independent Assessor and the Councillor Conduct Tribunal. The Department noted that the initial determination of complaints, which includes an assessment of whether a complaint is ‘frivolous’ is undertaken by the Office of the Independent Assessor, and that the Office of the Independent Assessor necessarily is separated from the Department.
The Department supports 77 councils and 578 councillors throughout Queensland, including providing formal training and advice, which was particularly relevant in the aftermath of the 2024 local government elections that resulted in significant turnover in the councillor cohort. Of the mandatory councillor training that is administered by the Department, one module of the Local Government Leaders Program specifically focuses on conflicts of interest, registers of interest, and the code of conduct, with required completion within six months of a councillor’s election.
On 23 June 2025, the ECQ tabled its report entitled ‘2024 State general election report’. The ECQ is required to report on the operation of part 7 of the Electoral Act 1992 in relation to the State general election, which most recently was held in October 2024.
During the election period, ECQ compliance activities were focused on the proper authorisation of election material, compliance with signage requirements at polling places and increasing awareness of electoral laws in relation to these matters.
During the State general election, the ECQ dealt with 55 notifications of potential non-compliance as follows:
To uphold electoral integrity and counter disinformation, the ECQ adopted a proactive strategy by making accurate information about the electoral process readily available to Queenslanders through its website and social media platforms. The ECQ also collaborated with the Australian Government’s Electoral Integrity Assurance Taskforce to support the ECQ in monitoring threats of potential interference at the election.
Directive issued to lobbyists
On 19 June 2025, a directive made by the Queensland Integrity Commissioner, entitled ‘Mandatory Foundational Training for Registered Lobbyists’ took effect. The directive was made under section 57(1)(a) and (c) of the Integrity Act 2009 and specified that registered lobbyists were required to undertake an approved foundational training course. All lobbyists registered on or before 1 June 2025 are required to complete the approved training course on or before the 31 July 2025, whereas lobbyist registered after 1 June have two months from the date of their registration as a lobbyist. Failure to comply with the directive is a ground for taking regulatory action or imposing sanctions under the Integrity Act 2009.
On 23 June 2025, the Councillor Conduct Tribunal (CCT) published its decision and reasons relating to alleged misconduct of two Councillors from Ipswich City Council (Council).
The decision considered five allegations against the one councillor (the First Councillor) and one allegation against another councillor (the Second Councillor) pursuant to section 150L(1)(a) of the Local Government Act 2009 (Qld) (LG Act). The allegations arose following disruption within Council that followed the dismissal of the entire Council due to allegations of impropriety (and subsequent criminal convictions) that involved former Mayor Paul Pisasale.
The allegations relating to both councillors arose from decisions to appear on several media platforms where the councillors made statements regarding the decision of Council and the preparation of a Community Engagement Report that the First Councillor and Second Councillor formed the view that it did not reflect the feedback of all community members that participated. Both councillors initially raised their concerns with the Council CEO unsuccessfully, after which time the councillors made various public statements, to which the allegations related:
The CCT found that neither the First Councillor nor the Second Councillor engaged in dishonesty, and raised their concerns under their obligations under sections 4(2) and 12(3) of the LG Act, and that their actions in making various public statements stemmed from their “obligation to ensure the ratepayers of the Council’s jurisdiction were aware of the concerns”. The CCT determined that neither the First Councillor nor the Second Councillor engaged in misconduct under section 150AQ(1)(a)(ii) of the LG Act, and no recommendations were made.
If you found this insight article useful and you would like to subscribe to Gadens’ updates, click here.
Authored by:
Daniel Maroske, Partner
Anna Fanelli, Senior Associate
Jacinta Beecher, Lawyer
Caitlin Holmes, Lawyer
Jonathan Kumar, Legal Assistant